This is a superb read. It's normally the type of book I go for, but I checked this out on the recommendation of a friend. McFadden is very readable, and her style had me hooked through the slow burn start. This is good writing and the twists and turns (I will not spoil them for you) had me gasping. This is clever stuff, and I am sufficiently intrigued to continue in the trilogy.
-
I was most interested to read this book as I have keenly devoured all the Gerald Durrell volumes, and especially appreciated items about his family - not just the famed Corfu trilogy, but also Marrying off Mother and Other Stories, and The Picnic and Suchlike Pandemonium. I had also read Whatever Happened to Margo, Margo Durrell's not entirely successful account of her years running a boarding house in Bournemouth.
This book filled in some historical details I had not known - especially about Theo, and the older brothers - and was helpful in this, and also made me want to revisit the Corfiot books. I found the style slightly clunky to read and so this was not as enjoyable as it could have been. I do recommend it for fans, but I think the less historical accounts by the family themselves are more interesting to read.
0Add a comment
-
Butter Chicken is a tradional dish served in Indian restuarants in the UK, but it is not in the least bit traditional. To me, it tastes like a mildly spicy tomato soup with lots of cream. I recently went to Southall, a part of London which is predominantly Asian, and purchased a few spices - I want to make lots of spicy meals with varied spices, rather than just using curry powder blends. Here is my first attempt - it's fairly hot but won't burn your mouth. I put too many coriander seeds and too much ginger in when I made it, so have toned both of these down. I used mushrooms - you can use chicken if you wish. I doubt this is authentic or novel but it is nice.IngredientsCurry:
- two large chopped onions
- ten cloves of garlic
- a lump of ginger, unpeeled, about as big as your thumb
- one red chilli, whole
- a pinch of fenugreek seeds
- a pinch of coriander seeds
- two pinches of mustard seeds
- a pinch of cumin seeds
- a teaspoon of garam masala
- a large handful of mushrooms, cut into about six pieces per mushroom
- a tin of chopped tomatoes
- a finely grated carrot
- a pinch of salt
- a teaspoon of sugar
- 75ml soy cream/single cream
- a large knob of butter
- a mug of basmati rice (extra long is best)
- five green cardamom
- a black cardamom
- three cloves
- half a teaspoon of tumeric (or some saffron if you have it)
- a small piece of cinnamon stick
2. Bash the coriander seed and fenugreek seeds in a mortar and pestle - don't ground them to powder, just break them up a bit.3. Heat some oil in a pan until it shimmers. Add the coriander, fenugreek and cumin seeds. Heat through for two minutes, making sure you don't burn them. Add the mustard seeds which will puff up. If seeds start spitting, it is too hot.4. Add the garlic, chilli, and ginger paste and continue cooking on a moderate heat for five minutes. Add the garam masala.5. Add the chopped onion and cook on a lower heat until they are soft.6. Add the mushrooms and soften for five minutes.7. Add the tomatoes, carrot, sugar (or jaggery if you have it) and salt, if using. Simmer for 30 minutes.8. While that simmers, wash the rice in a sieve under a running tap. Put in a non-stick saucepan with the green and black cardamom, clodes, turmeric, and cinnamon. Using the same mug you used to measure the rice, add one and two thirds mugs of cold water. Stir, cover, and put on a high heat.9. Bring the rice to the boil, then reduce heat to moderate for five minutes. Keep covered!10. Turn the heat down to the lowest setting and leave for ten minutes.11. Fish out all the solid spices, and fluff up with a fork.12. Go back to the curry. Add the cream and heat through. Melt in the large knob of butter.13. Serve14. Eat.2View comments
-
This week saw the funeral of Constantine II of Greece. All the royal families are connected one way or another but he was more connected than most, being very closely related to several monarchs. At the start of his reign in 1964 he married Anne Marie of Denmark, the daughter of a king, and granddaughter of two kings. Such marriages were once common, but I think this was the last time a king married a king's daughter. I doubt it will happen again - monarchs across Europe tend to marry their own nationals now, and it's not expected for them to marry other royals. Constantine's marriage was a love match - the royals used to be more numerous, meet more often, and feel more constrained in their marital choice.Constantine was the son and grandson of kings of Greece. His grandmother was daughter and sister of German emperors, and the daughter of a british princess. His mother was the daughter of the dejure king of Hanover, and the granddaughter of a Danish princess. His maternal grandmother was the daughter of Wilhelm II, the last German emperor, who was still alive at the time of his birth. Among his aunts and uncles were two kings of Greece and a king of Romania. He was first cousin of the last queen of Yugoslavia, the last king of Romania, the current de jure king of Hanover. The late Duke of Edinburgh was a first cousin once removed. His sister married the king of Spain, and current king of Spain is his nephew.Anne Marie is the sister of the current queen of Denmark, and daughter and granddaughter of kings of Denmark. Her mother was daughter of the king of Sweden. Her mother was also the grandaughter of one of Queen Victoria's sons who was still alive at Anne Marie's birth. Among her closer cousins are the king of Norway, Sweden, and the former king of Belgium.Constantine was a young king and made some foolish choices. Greek monarchs were nearly all deposed (sometimes twice) or assassinated and it is nor suprising that the monarchy came to an end in 1967, then finally with a referendum in 1973. It was often said that he might return, but his support of an attempted coup meant he would never return. Without that, he may well have, but I suspect he would not have lasted. Greece has been several decades without a monarch now, and will not return to monarchy.0
Add a comment
-
Sister Andre, born Lucile Randon, has died in France aged 118. She was the world's oldest living person - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-64314673Born in 1904, her life must have seen many changes. I was born in 1971, and remember many people born in the nineteenth century and the first decade of the twentieth century. It is odd to think that there are now only 19 people alive born before 1910. The new oldest person, Maria Branyas Morera of Spain is a mere 115. The oldest living man is 113.0
Add a comment
-
BBC Breakfast TV is forty years old today. It seems strange now to think that TV channels didn't start until 9am. At Gran's we had the radiogram on in the morning. I remember the day it started, coming down in my dressing gown and seeing the TV on while we were eating breakfast. "I feel strange having the TV on before I am dressed" declared Gran. "It feels wrong, as though they can see me". Frank Bough and Selina Scott lounged on the sofa interviewing guests. People wore jumpers instead of suits. It was very informal and very different.I don't watch TV in the morning now, but prefer Radio 4 - I like listening as I get on with things. Perhaps it would be nice to have less TV again.0
Add a comment
-
I had read a review of this book by Glenconner, a lady-in-waiting to Princess Margaret. Indeed, it was she who introduced Margaret to Mustiqe. Born the daughter of an earl, married to an eccentric and disagreeable Scottish aristocrat, her story had the makings of a great memoir. Glenconner is a remnant from a bygone age who came out at a debutante ball, coped with a difficult husband and tragedies in her children's lives, and, the selling point, a long servant and friend of Princess Margaret. This is no salacious tell-all story, nor is it a hagiographical tribute. We are reminded that Margaret visited AIDS patients in hospital regularly and privately, long before the publicised (and useful for that reason) visits of Diana. Margaret was clearly a difficult woman but not without her charms and she had an attractive character. This a was great read.
As a footnote, I went to an audience with Anne Glenconner in conversation with the ever brilliant Gyles Brandreth. Unexpectedly, she came across as both slightly bewildered and slightly mischievous. It was most entertaining.
0Add a comment
-
I used to love the books of Jean Plaidy, and have read a great many of them. My aunt had them and lent thm to me, and then I added to them when visiting jumble sales etc. They are historical novels - and fiction - but better researched than many, and, for me as a teenager voracious for history, they provided an accessible pathway to periods and figures I didn't know.
I first read this one in 1984 and it was Review #78 - I am now breaking my rules about writing reviews twice - and I came across it as a free e book recently, and decided to read it again. It follows the life of Eleanore, Duchess of Aquitaine, Queen of France, and Queen of England from her childhood through to the death of Becket. Her first marriage and especially her participation in the Second Crusade were little known to me, and the exotic locations make the story especially interesting. Some liberty is taken with the facts - an affair with Saladin!!?? The myth of Becket's maternal roots is also repeated, but overall it is an exciting and intelligent read. Curiously, I have not the read the following volume, which deals with the latter part of Henry II's reign, and the bitterness of the familial wars brought to life in the Lion in Winter - I must correct this sometime, and perhaps read the whole of the Plantagenet Saga. Reading this book again took me back many years, and I was back in my old room sitting by the bed devouring the book one rainy week during a long summer holiday.
0Add a comment
-
I write a lot. Since 1984, I have written a diary most days - generally about five days a week. Sometimes it is a short entry, sometimes it is much longer.
I write short stories. I do this because I enjoy creative writing. They are not for publishing and you won't get to see them. I write one or two a month.
I write emails. I write about 150 emails a day at work. I write about 70 a week on my private email account. I write about 20 a week on the church account where I am secretary. I have two penpals and write two long emails a week, one to each.
I write letters. I write about three a week privately, and a few more than that for work.
I write minutes. I attend about eight meetings a month that need to be minuted.
I write stuff for other people. I write some articles and blog posts for some projects that interest me, and this brings a modest income. I like not having my name on such things. I am halting some of this by the end of the year, as I am too busy.
I write some family history stuff and history stuff. I am compiling a list of regnal dates for Europe. There are about 300 lists so far. I have published a few on a different blog: https://royal-lists.blogspot.com/2021/10/introduction_29.html but I am working on them more before publishing others.
I have not written much on this blog. This is a pity. I will try to rectify it. I will publish book reviews of most of the books I read. I will comment on the inanities of life.
In all of my writing (in my own name), other than emails/correspondence/minutes, I am the intended audience. Not many people read my blog - only a couple of hundred in the first two weeks after an entry is published. Even fewer comment. That is fine. I am happy if people read these things, and not bothered if they don't. For me, it is the process of writing that I really enjoy, and that brings its own reward.
0Add a comment
-
After a bit of a break, it is my intention to blog more, and, in particular, to publish reviews of most of the books I am reading - I write a review of every book I read, numbering them, and it is time some of them were published to encourage you to read more.
There are many books about the Romanovs, and most of them concentrate on the end of the dynasty, with the disasters that befell Nicholas and Alexandra. Some books focus a bit on Peter the Great, or Catherine the Great, but few will say much about Michael, the first Romanov Tsar, or Elizabeth, or Nicholas I. What I appreciated about this volume was the weighting given to all periods of Romanov rule from 1613-1918. I learnt quite a bit about some of the other Tsars and Tsaritsas, especially in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Simon Sebag Montefiore is a fine author and I have enjoyed other works of his (Young Stalin #1219 and Jerusalem the Biography #1453).
The thing that really struck me was the role of women in the Romanovs. Until Paul I, who hated his mother and passed the Pauline Laws to prevent women succeeding to the throne, there were several Tsaritsas regnant - not just Catherine the Great, but another Catherine, Anna, Elizabeth. Furthermore, the wives and mothers of the Tsars played important roles and held regencies too. Like most rulers of Russia over the centuries, they were all-powerful and unscrupulous. Perhaps a large nation like Russia needs such rulers, as this continues to be the case.
0Add a comment
Add a comment